Saturday, 28 January 2017

Causes of WWII


Was using Appeasement justified?

IT WAS JUSTIFIED
Using appeasement was correct as Chamberlin feared another war and people wanted peace so the public did not go to war and wanted to avoid it
Chamberlin had faith in the League of Nations to solve their problems
Britain was too weak to go for war in 1938, it needed time to re-arm
The TOV was considered unfair and that is why Chamberlin gave into the demands of Hitler
He feared and communism and thought that Hitler would help in destroy communism
He also misjudged Hitler, he said that Sudetenland was the last thing he wanted
USA were following isolationism so they did not want to stand up against Germany without American support
The depression had hit all the countries so, economic problems were a higher priority

IT WAS NOT JUSTIFIED
Ø  It let Hitler grow stronger
Ø  It humiliated Britain who were using appeasement as no other country in the world could ever trust the British support again
Ø  He mobilized his navy because he gave Czechoslovakia his assurance in 1938, but then came under the influence of Mussolini who got them both together at the Munich Agreement in which Hitler got what he wanted which was Sudetenland and eventually the whole of Czechoslovakia
Ø  It abandoned many people in the hands of the Nazis
Ø  It let Hitler achieve his aims which was to abolish the Treaty of Versailles and he was successful
Ø  The Spanish Civil War showed the strength of the German armed forces but even then they did not tell Hitler to disarm





Did the Nazi-Soviet pact start War in 1939?
Nazi-Soviet Pact
Hitler did not want fight a war on 2 fronts that is why he signed the pact.
The pact gave Hitler a direct way to attain all his aims which were:-
1.To abolish the TOV:- The TOV had not allowed Germany to enter into any of the foreign land. He broke this.
2.To attain Lebensraum:- By invading into Eastern Europe he was getting greater living space and was uniting all the Germans
3.To defeat Communism:- Even though Hitler signed a treaty with Russia he was very adamant in defeating communism and according to the map he was moving one step closer Russia
It was certain after Munich that Britain and France would not go for war over Poland, only the Russians would object to this so signing the treaty will clear the way for them
The pact secret agreements in which they decided that Poland and many more countries would be divided

Other factors
Appeasement:- Britain and France always gave into what Hitler wanted and that is one of the reason why War began, appeasement made Hitler more bold as he had already got through appeasement:
1.Remilitarization of Rhineland
2.Anschluss with Austria
3.Czechoslovakia
The failure of the League of Nations, it was unable to stop Hitler and many other conflicts
1.Spanish Civil War
2.Remilitarization of Rhineland, the TOV had forbidden this and one of the main reasons as to why the LON existed was to uphold the TOV.
3.Anschluss with Austria, the TOV had forbidden this and one of the main reasons as to why the LON existed was to uphold the TOV.
Militarism, the Germans were re-arming secretly and huge armed forces


League Of Nations: Revision Guide

Which Country should be blamed for the failure of the League of Nations?

Britain and France
They were the leading countries in the LON, they were only looking for their own interests
They did not want to upset Poland so they gave Vilna to them.
They did not want to send their armies in places where it was not required
They thought that they could do anything an France invaded Ruhr without the consultation of the League
The Conference of Ambassadors were given a higher authority than the League
In the case of Manchuria, they did not pass many economic sanctions on Japan as they felt that Japan might retaliate in war
They were slow to react in this situation
When Italy captured Abyssinia, they did not want to upset Mussolini because he was their biggest ally against Hitler.
There were secret dealings between Hoare and Laval unknown to the League
At the same time Hitler marches into Rhineland and turns Frances attention leaving Abyssinia

Italy
They were one of the leading members of the league and they showed a lot of aggression in the Greece.
They got what they wanted by going against the league 
They were also a leading member who should have taken actions in other crisis but they left it all to Britain and France
There was a great economic depression and the fascist governments like Italy were looking for more of external success

They again showed their aggression in Abyssinia





How successful was the League?


It was very successful
In 1921, the league had held a plebiscite in which the Silesian people were made to vote and the league divided it according to the result which was that the industrial regions were given to Germany and the agricultural region was given to Poland
Sweden and Finland were having an argument on the Aaland Islands in 1921, after an investigation the island was given to Finland and it was abided by Sweden
In 1924, there was an argument between Turkey and Iraq over Mosul. There was an investigation was there and Mosul was given to Iraq. Turkey accepted this
Greece invaded Bulgaria and the league interfered and ordered Greece to leave and pay compensation the Greece agreed to it.
They also made many changes in Europe like they helped many refugees
They introduced the International Labor Organization and introduced MAX. 48 hour work per week
They introduced the World Health Organization in which they prevented many deaths by diseases.
They made an International highway codes
There was a pact signed in 1928, called the Kellogg-Briand pact which meant that if there was dispute they would solve it peacefully.

It was not very successful
There was a border dispute in Vilna, between Poland and Lithuania, despite Vilna being their capital the league gave it to Poland as Britain and France did not want to upset Poland
The league were not consulted in the invasion of Ruhr
In 1923, Lithuania seized Memel, the League told them to leave but the Conference of Ambassadors gave it to them
Mussolinis aggressions was not contained in the Corfu crisis of 1923
The failure of The Geneva Protocol in 1924 showed how weak the League was
The disarmament commission was unable to disarm, most of the country
There were many international agreements, which showed that the nations did not rely on the League. Treaties like Washington, The Rapallo Treaty, Young plan and many more
The failure of containing the aggression put forward by the Japanese and the Italians in the Abyssinian crisis and Manchuria.
Italy and Japan were the 2 main countries in the League and this was the situation, big country against a small one. They were very unsuccessful in doing so.